Print Page   |   Contact Us   |   Sign In   |   Register
Domestic Violence in Senate Monday
Share |





Please Immediately Tell Senators to Severely Punish

Anyone Who Commits Violent Acts Against a Partner,

Instead of Inventing New Ways to Harass

Gun Owners, Which Makes No One Safer

March 11, 2016


Following the unanimous passage of S805 out of the Senate Law and Public Safety Committee on March 10, the bill is being fast tracked and is now scheduled for a full Senate vote on Monday, March 14.  The March 10 Committee hearing was packed with anti-gun activists, and the two Republican committee members -- Senators Christopher Bateman (R16) and James Holzapfel (R10) joined with the 3 Democrats on the committee in supporting the bill.  Representatives of both ANJRPC and NRA testified against the bill.

Please immediately tell Members of the State Senate to oppose S805 as written and instead support proposals that severely punish those who commit violent acts, and that hold accountable anyone who makes false allegations of domestic violence.

S805 is the same misguided legislation that was passed by the legislature and vetoed by Governor Christie last year.

ANJRPC strongly condemns anyone who commits violent aggressive acts against a domestic partner, and believes that such a person should not have access to firearms, and should be punished as severely as possible. Federal law currently provides for this, and New Jersey's existing domestic violence law is already one of the toughest in the country.

On the surface, S805 seems well-intentioned. But instead of focusing on increasing the severity of punishment for those who commit actual violent acts, the legislation seems obsessed with harassing and intimidating anyone who owns firearms and is also accused of domestic violence, even where no actual violence has occurred - which is often the case under existing New Jersey law.

It comes as a surprise to many that under current New Jersey law, the grounds for a "domestic violence act" may be as minor as a verbal argument that purposely causes annoyance (harassment). A verbal argument with no violent act whatsoever can and frequently does result in seizure and forfeiture of firearms, and permanent loss of gun rights. There is even one infamous case where throwing pretzels resulted in a domestic violence claim.

Other similar types of non-violent acts that constitute "domestic violence" and can result in firearms forfeiture include staying in the home despite being asked to leave by a spouse who holds title to the home (criminal trespass); and scaring a spouse with a halloween mask (putting another in fear by physical menace). There are several others, and they arise on a regular basis in the Garden State.

Unfortunately S805, which appears to be part of a larger national agenda, fails to recognize that New Jersey law is unique in allowing minor non-violent acts to be classified as "domestic violence." It also fails to recognize that false allegations of domestic violence are sometimes made to gain advantage in divorce cases, or out of spite, without any consequence to the accuser. S805 facilitates the loss of Constitutional rights and seizure of firearms where no violent act was committed.

S805 is fundamentally flawed, and does nothing to empower domestic violence victims, or to severely punish those who commit actual violence. Inexplicably, the sponsors of S805 ignore alternative pending legislation like S1905, similar to last session's A4486, which would strengthen protections for victims of domestic violence by providing minimum terms of incarceration, with set periods of parole ineligibility, for any offenders who commit physically violent acts.

See ANJRPC's full position paper on S805 here.

Community Search
Sign In


NRA Basic Rifle Training Class Saturday June 2, 2018

Right To Carry Roadshow! Sunday 6/10/2018

Dedicated to responsible firearms ownership and use since 1934
Privacy Statement/Legal Notices
Please send comments on this website to